What Are Typical Subcontractor Margins?

A practical look at typical subcontractor margins and the factors that erode them, based on insights from Riffle’s 2025 Subcontractor Survey and industry benchmarks.

Sonny Versoza
December 4, 2025

Every subcontractor has asked the same question at some point: Are our margins normal, or are we leaving money on the table?

It’s a tough benchmark to pin down. Margins vary by trade, region, bid strategy, and how well a company controls scope creep. But our 2025 Subcontractor Survey gives a clearer picture of what subcontractors are actually earning today and why margins feel tighter than ever.

Here’s what the data says, plus how subs can protect the profit they already work hard to win.

Most Subcontractors Are Sitting in the Same Margin Range

Across industries like construction finishes, specialties, MEP, openings, and equipment supply, subcontractor margins tend to fall into a predictable band.

Industry research from sources like Construction Dive, Dodge Data, and CFMA shows that typical subcontractor margins land between 8 and 15 percent, depending on trade and market conditions.

Our survey of 100 U.S. subcontractors backs this up. Even though respondents didn’t report exact percentages, their behavior around bidding, software investment, and filtering priorities reflects an environment where margins feel tight and must be protected at every step.

Most firms said the same thing: margins are workable, but small mistakes erase them fast.

The Biggest Threat to Margin Isn’t Labor or Material Costs. It’s Chaos.

Subs are used to fluctuating material prices and labor shortages. What hurts margin more consistently is disorganization.

The survey highlighted three patterns that hit margins hardest:

  • Poor filtering leads to low-quality bids
  • Scope clarity is inconsistent
  • PM-driven teams often double-handle or rework tasks

Filtering the right opportunities was the top challenge for 73% of subcontractors, regardless of size. When the wrong jobs slip through or when the team spends too much time sorting junk bids, profit takes a hit before pricing even begins.

Subs also told us that they lose time and money on scope issues. Missing items, miscommunication, and outdated documents all chip away at margin.

Margins aren’t shrinking because subs can’t estimate. They shrink because the workflow around estimating is messy.

Margin Pressure Gets Worse as Bid Volume Rises

Mid-size firms (31 to 60 employees) often submit 16 to 30 bids per week. At that pace, clarity becomes a competitive advantage. One misplaced email or missed addendum can wipe out the profit on a job or, worse, turn a good-looking project into a headache with razor-thin returns.

Larger firms feel pressure in different ways. Many still rely on PMs to handle bidding, which causes scope inconsistencies and slower turnaround times. Even when the company wins the right work, execution problems eat away at margins during the project.

Margin isn’t about estimating skill. It’s about controlling the process.

Smaller Subs Face a Different Margin Challenge

Subs with 1 to 10 employees said their biggest issue wasn’t willingness to adopt tech but simply time. When owners, estimators, and PMs are often the same person, it becomes hard to compare jobs, price consistently, or follow up with GCs in a structured way.

Time pressure leads to rushed estimates, and rushed estimates lead to thin profits.

These firms usually operate at the lowest end of the margin range, not because the work is priced incorrectly, but because there’s no breathing room in the workflow.

Why Subs in the 11–30 Range Are Seeing the Healthiest Margins

Our survey consistently showed that this group is the most tech-forward. 94% identified as early adopters, and 83% spend at least three percent of their budget on software.

This group also said they have clearer processes, cleaner handoffs, and faster turnaround on estimates.

It’s not that tech magically increases margin. It’s that structure reduces the noise that normally eats profit.

External Benchmarks Support the Survey Findings

Industry studies paint a consistent picture:

  • Specialty trades like drywall, flooring, acoustics, glazing, and millwork often target 10 to 12%.
  • MEP trades often sit closer to 8 to 10%.
  • High-risk or specialty equipment trades may reach 15% or higher, depending on project type.
  • GCs often operate at 3 to 6 percent, which pushes more scope and risk onto subs.

Margins aren’t “bad,” but they’re fragile. The market rewards subs who stay organized and penalizes those who run the business from an inbox.

Protecting Margin Starts Before the Estimate

The survey makes one thing clear: controlling margin begins long before numbers hit a spreadsheet.

Healthy-margin subs do three things well:

  • Filter aggressively
  • Build consistent workflows between PMs and estimators
  • Keep data in one place so nothing slips

Most subs are not losing money in Excel. They’re losing money in Outlook.

What This Means for Subcontractors

Margins will always fluctuate, but the most profitable subcontractors keep their process clean. They reduce chaos, organize bids in one place, and make sure the whole team works from the same source of truth.

A simple, structured workflow protects profit better than any spreadsheet trick.

That’s why we’re building RiffleCM. A smarter way to manage ITBs, estimates, and internal coordination so subcontractors can protect the margin they already earn.

Join the waitlist at rifflecm.com.

Sonny Versoza
Sonny is RiffleCM's Content and Social Media Manager, with years of experience as an educator, writer, researcher, and communications specialist.

Tags

Estimating
Automation

Eliminating Manual Errors in Construction Bids

Common questions about reducing errors and improving accuracy

What causes most manual errors in subcontractor bids?

Manual errors usually come from disconnected workflows — things like outdated spreadsheets, inconsistent templates, or rekeying the same data multiple times. When project info lives across emails, texts, and PDFs, small mistakes add up fast.

How can software help reduce bidding mistakes?

Purpose-built estimating software automates repetitive tasks like data entry, quantity takeoffs, and revision tracking. Instead of chasing down the latest drawings or retyping costs, your team works from one centralized, accurate system — cutting errors before they happen.

Is automation complicated to set up for small subcontractors?

Not with modern tools like Riffle. You can connect your email or ITB inbox in minutes, and automation starts working behind the scenes — identifying bid invites, tracking updates, and helping you prioritize the right opportunities. No IT department required.

How much time can automation actually save?

Most subcontractors save 6–10 hours per week just by eliminating manual re-entry and version confusion. That’s more time for estimating the next job, reviewing margins, or simply getting home on time.

Does automating bids mean losing control over pricing?

Not at all. Automation handles the busywork — you keep full control over pricing, scope, and judgment calls. Think of it as an assistant that gets the numbers right so you can focus on strategy.

How do I know if my team is underspending or overspending on software?

A good rule of thumb: most subcontractors invest 1–3% of annual revenue in digital tools. If you’re still running bids manually or using outdated systems, the real cost might be hidden in lost time and missed opportunities.

Why does accuracy matter so much in bidding?

Every error compounds — one missed line item or miscalculated rate can erase your entire profit margin. Accuracy doesn’t just win jobs; it protects your business from losses you don’t see coming.

How does Riffle help subcontractors eliminate manual work?

Riffle automates your bidding and project workflows from start to finish. It finds ITBs in your inbox, organizes bid invites, fills in estimating data, and tracks updates — helping subcontractors bid smarter, reduce errors, and grow revenue.

We Understand the Bottlenecks for Subs

My biggest weakness has always been follow-ups—I’m just not great at it. If I had a built-in reminder feature to follow up on projects automatically, that would be a game-changer. I’ve gotten better, but I could still use that extra nudge.

Bryan Dolgin
Project Manager, Division 10 subcontractor

Quoting can be chaotic. You have five different contractors sending out the same bid invite, each named differently. We end up with duplicate bids on the board or miss one entirely because it was labeled another way. There is no clear procedure when invites come in from multiple people.

Dustin Siegel
Project Manager, Division 10 subcontractor

Stay Informed

Get the latest on subcontractor business trends, research, and tools to help you grow profitably. Delivered monthly.

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.