Do Subcontractors Prefer Dedicated Estimators or PM-Led Bids?

A practical breakdown of PM-led vs. dedicated estimating for subcontractors, plus modern trends shaping how growing subs manage bids and build repeatable workflows.

Sonny Versoza
December 15, 2025

Every subcontractor hits a point where the same argument keeps coming up:
Should we hire a dedicated estimator, or let the PMs keep handling the bids?

Ask ten subcontractors, you’ll get ten different answers. But the trend across the industry is clear. As companies grow and work gets more complex, estimating can’t stay an “extra task.” It needs structure.

Here’s how the shift is happening and why it matters.

PM-Led Bidding Works… Until It Doesn’t

Smaller subcontractors usually start with PMs running bids. It makes sense.
They know the field. They know the pricing. They know the clients.

But as volume grows, so do the cracks:

  • Deadlines slip because PMs are on jobsites
  • Addendums get missed
  • Versions multiply
  • Follow-ups don't happen
  • Pricing gets inconsistent across the team

A PM can only juggle so many plates. Bidding starts slipping through the cracks long before anyone notices. They’re too busy doing real work to track all the invites.

This is where growth starts to stall.

Dedicated Estimators Bring Consistency, Not Just Speed

Larger subcontractors often shift to dedicated estimators because they need predictable results. One person owning the process creates:

  • Cleaner scopes
  • More consistent pricing
  • Better document control
  • Faster turnaround
  • Stronger relationships with GCs

It also removes the “hero mode” problem. The company stops relying on whichever PM is least overwhelmed this week.

And here’s the real benefit:
When estimators own the bid, PMs can focus on execution. That separation alone protects margin.

Hybrid Models Are Growing Fast

A trend we’re seeing across mid-size firms is the hybrid approach:

  • A dedicated estimator handles takeoff, compares scope, organizes files, and produces the base bid.
  • PMs jump in for alternates, labor assumptions, sequencing, and final adjustments.

This model brings the best of both worlds:

  • Field experience shapes the number
  • Estimator discipline shapes the workflow

GCs like this model too because bids arrive cleaner and questions get answered faster. Everyone’s lane is clearer.

Why Scale Pushes Teams Toward Dedicated Estimators

As subcontractors grow into 20, 30, 50+ employees, the volume of invites skyrockets. It’s impossible for PMs to stay on top of everything:

  • Too many drawings
  • Too many deadlines
  • Too much back-and-forth
  • Too many opportunities to miss a detail

Growth makes the old system crack.
Dedicated estimating lowers those failure points.

You don’t grow by bidding more.
You grow by bidding cleanly.

Technology Levels the Playing Field

Here’s the shift nobody talks about enough:
Software is making it possible for smaller subcontractors to operate with the discipline of a full estimating department without actually hiring one.

Tools now help subs:

  • Organize every ITB in one place
  • Track deadlines automatically
  • Standardize bid packets
  • Store templates and assumptions
  • Eliminate version confusion
  • Follow up consistently

That means even PM-led teams can work like mature estimating departments if they have the right workflow.

And when the company does hire an estimator later, the system is already built. No messy transition. No relearning.

How GCs See It (The Part Subs Don’t Always Hear)

GCs don’t care who builds the number, PM or estimator.
They care about:

  • Clarity
  • Speed
  • Predictability
  • Fewer surprises

A PM-led bid that’s clean beats a dedicated estimator’s bid that’s chaotic.

But in the long run, GCs tend to prefer subcontractors with reliable processes. They want subs who never send the wrong file, never miss an addendum, never forget a follow-up. Structure builds trust. Trust builds backlog.

So Which One Is Better? It Depends on Your Phase of Growth

Here’s the honest breakdown:

Small subs (under ~10):
PM-led bids work fine if the workload is controlled.

Growing subs (10–30):
Hybrid models shine. PMs contribute insight; estimators bring consistency.

Mid-size to large subs (30+):
Dedicated estimating becomes a competitive advantage, especially when deadlines pile up.

What matters most isn’t the title.
It’s whether your workflow can hold the weight of your growth.

Where Riffle Fits

Riffle doesn’t take sides. PM-led, estimator-led, hybrid. Your business, your call.

What Riffle does do is:

  • Keep every invite and file organized
  • Assign clear ownership
  • Maintain one clean version history
  • Standardize the way your team submits bids
  • Automate follow-ups
  • Remove the friction that causes mistakes

Whether your estimator is a full-time position or a PM squeezing in bids between site visits, Riffle gives them the structure to win more work.

What This Means for Subcontractors

If your team is debating PM-led vs. dedicated estimating, ask a simpler question:

Do we have a process that scales?

If not, build the workflow first.
Then add people when the system is ready for them.

Growth rewards structure, not heroics.

Join the waitlist at rifflecm.com.

Sonny Versoza
Sonny is RiffleCM's Content and Social Media Manager, with years of experience as an educator, writer, researcher, and communications specialist.

Tags

Estimating
Automation
Bid Accuracy
Featured

Eliminating Manual Errors in Construction Bids

Common questions about reducing errors and improving accuracy

What causes most manual errors in subcontractor bids?

Manual errors usually come from disconnected workflows — things like outdated spreadsheets, inconsistent templates, or rekeying the same data multiple times. When project info lives across emails, texts, and PDFs, small mistakes add up fast.

How can software help reduce bidding mistakes?

Purpose-built estimating software automates repetitive tasks like data entry, quantity takeoffs, and revision tracking. Instead of chasing down the latest drawings or retyping costs, your team works from one centralized, accurate system — cutting errors before they happen.

Is automation complicated to set up for small subcontractors?

Not with modern tools like Riffle. You can connect your email or ITB inbox in minutes, and automation starts working behind the scenes — identifying bid invites, tracking updates, and helping you prioritize the right opportunities. No IT department required.

How much time can automation actually save?

Most subcontractors save 6–10 hours per week just by eliminating manual re-entry and version confusion. That’s more time for estimating the next job, reviewing margins, or simply getting home on time.

Does automating bids mean losing control over pricing?

Not at all. Automation handles the busywork — you keep full control over pricing, scope, and judgment calls. Think of it as an assistant that gets the numbers right so you can focus on strategy.

How do I know if my team is underspending or overspending on software?

A good rule of thumb: most subcontractors invest 1–3% of annual revenue in digital tools. If you’re still running bids manually or using outdated systems, the real cost might be hidden in lost time and missed opportunities.

Why does accuracy matter so much in bidding?

Every error compounds — one missed line item or miscalculated rate can erase your entire profit margin. Accuracy doesn’t just win jobs; it protects your business from losses you don’t see coming.

How does Riffle help subcontractors eliminate manual work?

Riffle automates your bidding and project workflows from start to finish. It finds ITBs in your inbox, organizes bid invites, fills in estimating data, and tracks updates — helping subcontractors bid smarter, reduce errors, and grow revenue.

We Understand the Bottlenecks for Subs

My biggest weakness has always been follow-ups—I’m just not great at it. If I had a built-in reminder feature to follow up on projects automatically, that would be a game-changer. I’ve gotten better, but I could still use that extra nudge.

Bryan Dolgin
Project Manager, Division 10 subcontractor

Quoting can be chaotic. You have five different contractors sending out the same bid invite, each named differently. We end up with duplicate bids on the board or miss one entirely because it was labeled another way. There is no clear procedure when invites come in from multiple people.

Dustin Siegel
Project Manager, Division 10 subcontractor

Stay Informed

Get the latest on subcontractor business trends, research, and tools to help you grow profitably. Delivered monthly.

Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.